<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.urbanhabitat.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Land Use (News)</title>
 <link>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/128</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en-US</language>
<item>
 <title>Chevron: Contra Costa Times July 25 letters</title>
 <link>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2358</link>
 <description>&lt;span class=&quot;body_text&quot;&gt;As the Times reported on July 18, &amp;quot;Chevron refinery plan approved,&amp;quot; a narrow Richmond City Council majority approved Chevron&#039;s plans for expanding its Richmond refinery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The council had the opportunity — indeed, the obligation — to ensure the project not proceed without important public health and environmental safeguards in place, to be negotiated in a public and transparent process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the council majority (Maria Viramontes, Nat Bates, John Marquez, Ludmyrna Lopez, and Harpreet Sandhu) betrayed the communities they were elected to represent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ardent concerns expressed by Richmond families, neighborhood groups, environmentalists and even State Attorney General Jerry Brown fell on deaf ears.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2358&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2358#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/126">Environmental Health (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/128">Land Use (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/114">Richmond</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/news">News</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Editor2</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2358 at http://www.urbanhabitat.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Oakland City Council strikes down new tax</title>
 <link>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2372</link>
 <description>&lt;span class=&quot;body_text&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;byline&quot;&gt;By Christopher Heredia&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oakland&#039;s fiscal problems got $12 million worse Tuesday, when the City Council rejected a landscaping and lighting tax increase approved by property owners two months ago but challenged for improperly weighting votes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The loss of the anticipated tax funds bumps the city&#039;s projected revenue shortfall this year to $50 million - 10 percent of its general fund budget - and will send city officials scrambling in the coming months to make deep spending cuts, including possible layoffs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2372&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2372#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/128">Land Use (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/116">Oakland</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/118">Privatization (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/news">News</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Editor2</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2372 at http://www.urbanhabitat.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Richmond council OKs Chevron refinery plan</title>
 <link>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2312</link>
 <description>&lt;span class=&quot;body_text&quot;&gt;(07-17) 09:09 PDT RICHMOND -- A sharply divided Richmond City Council approved on Thursday Chevron&#039;s controversial plan for a major upgrade of its century-old refinery and accepted $61 million from the oil company for community programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The council voted 5-4 to approve a conditional use permit for Chevron to replace a hydrogen plant, install new hydrogen-purifying equipment, build a new cogeneration power plant and replace other antiquated machinery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We&#039;re pleased with the vote and look forward to moving ahead with construction,&amp;quot; said Dean O&#039;Hair, a Chevron spokesman. &amp;quot;This project will make us more efficient and reliable than we already are.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2312&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2312#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/157">chevron</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/126">Environmental Health (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/128">Land Use (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/114">Richmond</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/news">News</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Editor2</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2312 at http://www.urbanhabitat.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Richmond City Council approves Chevron&#039;s plan to upgrade refinery by 5-4 vote</title>
 <link>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2311</link>
 <description>&lt;span class=&quot;body_text&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;byline&quot;&gt;By Katherine Tam &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A divided Richmond City Council early Thursday morning approved Chevron&#039;s contentious plan to replace decades-old equipment at the local refinery, as well as a separate agreement for the oil company to provide $61.6 million for public safety, low-income healthcare and other services.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Environmental activists, who say Chevron&#039;s plans pose a public health risk that has not been fully studied, immediately shouted &#039;Shame on you!&#039; from the audience and vowed to vote councilmembers out of office.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Councilwoman Ludmyrna Lopez defended the decision, saying a series of measures will require Chevron to cut emissions and other impacts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2311&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2311#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/157">chevron</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/126">Environmental Health (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/128">Land Use (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/114">Richmond</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/news">News</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Editor2</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2311 at http://www.urbanhabitat.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Opponents of Chevron Upgrade Promise Lawsuit</title>
 <link>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2314</link>
 <description>&lt;span class=&quot;body_text&quot;&gt;RICHMOND, Calif. (KCBS/AP)  -- Environmentalists have vowed to fight the Richmond city council’s decision to allow Chevron to upgrade equipment at its refinery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After an emotional city council meeting that lasted until 2 a.m., the council on Thursday voted 5 – 4 in favor of an upgrade that Chevron officials said would allow them to generate less pollution and refine a wider range of oil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jessica Tovar of Communities for a Better Environment asserted that the environmental impact report submitted to the city was incomplete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2314&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2314#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/157">chevron</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/126">Environmental Health (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/128">Land Use (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/114">Richmond</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/news">News</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Editor2</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2314 at http://www.urbanhabitat.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title> Planning Commission Leaps Tall Buildings</title>
 <link>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2324</link>
 <description>&lt;span class=&quot;body_text&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;byline&quot;&gt;By Richard Brenneman&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Berkeley planning commissioners continued their march through the Downtown Area Plan last week with a side excursion through a controversial economic study.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During its two-year term the Downtown Area Plan Advisory Committee (DAPAC) has struggled to decide how many buildings should be built in Berkeley’s downtown area and how high they should be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Buildings of seven stories or higher have long been a focus of controversy in the city, pitting “smart growth” advocates against preservationists and neighborhood activists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2324&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2324#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/115">Berkeley</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/128">Land Use (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/news">News</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Editor2</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2324 at http://www.urbanhabitat.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title> Oakland Council OKs Four Finalists for Army Base Development</title>
 <link>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2325</link>
 <description>&lt;span class=&quot;body_text&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;byline&quot;&gt;By J. Douglas Allen-Taylor&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Oakland City Council voted late Tuesday night to approve four finalist developers to bid on its 108-acre Oakland Army Base Gateway Development project. The four finalists—pared down from an original list of eight developers who bid on the job—will now be invited to submit requests for proposals within the next four to six months.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2325&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2325#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/117">Housing &amp;amp; Homelessness (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/128">Land Use (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/116">Oakland</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/118">Privatization (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/news">News</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Editor2</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2325 at http://www.urbanhabitat.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Press Release: Chevron Offers Richmond $61 Million to Approve Refinery Expansion</title>
 <link>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2307</link>
 <description>&lt;span class=&quot;body_text&quot;&gt;Richmond Residents and Bay Area Community say, “Our Health is Not for Sale.” In a last minute effort to lock-in City Council approval for Chevron’s refinery expansion, yesterday Chevron presented the City of Richmond with a $61 million dollar ‘Community Benefit Agreement’ (CBA). The Agreement, submitted to the city council in closed session immediately before the public council hearing, would reportedly include $6.75 million for jobs and education programs, $6 million for community health programs, and requires the City Council’s approval of the expansion project.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2307&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2307#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/126">Environmental Health (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/128">Land Use (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/114">Richmond</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/uh/inmedia">In the Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/news">News</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Editor2</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2307 at http://www.urbanhabitat.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lively meeting expected on Chevron expansion</title>
 <link>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2309</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;body_text&quot;&gt;by Carolyn Jones&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;body_text&quot;&gt;More than 1,000 people jammed a Richmond City Council meeting Tuesday night to make impassioned pleas for and against Chevron&#039;s plan to expand its waterfront refinery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The City Council is expected to meet again tonight to vote on the issue, which has galvanized environmentalists, community groups and labor unions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We&#039;re driving to the hospital while Chevron goes to the bank,&amp;quot; said Rev. Kenneth Davis, a Richmond resident. &amp;quot;My health is not for sale.&amp;quot;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2309&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2309#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/157">chevron</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/126">Environmental Health (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/128">Land Use (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/114">Richmond</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/news">News</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Editor2</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2309 at http://www.urbanhabitat.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Richmond council to resume Chevron deliberations tonight</title>
 <link>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2310</link>
 <description>&lt;span class=&quot;body_text&quot;&gt;By Katherine Tam&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deliberation on Chevron&#039;s contentious bid to upgrade decades-old equipment at its Richmond refinery continues tonight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Richmond City Council recessed its decision-making hearing at about 12:05 a.m. today and will resume at 7 p.m. at Kennedy High School&#039;s multipurpose room.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The council must decide whether Chevron&#039;s plan to replace its power plant, hydrogen plant and reformer will move forward. The Planning Commission last month approved a permit along with about 70 provisions, but neither Chevron nor environmental activists are satisfied. Both are appealing that ruling to the council.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2310&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.urbanhabitat.org/node/2310#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/157">chevron</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/126">Environmental Health (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/128">Land Use (News)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/taxonomy/term/114">Richmond</category>
 <category domain="http://www.urbanhabitat.org/news">News</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Editor2</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2310 at http://www.urbanhabitat.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
